Notation of Objectivity
Updated: May 29
Change is subjective motion in promotion of moment. I am predicting the fall of sciences' supremacy. If you can't believe it, then this post is for you in particular. Capitalism will outlive modern science, but capitalism never ruled. It might have been the ruler of slaves, but all slaves where willingly undignified in our own collective indecision for the subjective motion. Science is merely the tracking of the path that I have already undertaken it in, finished and completed in motion, onto the only moment that any movement ever could take place in. I am pulling you out of that moment and into reality.
Modern Science will persist for as long as we keep going for the nuts yet always miss the sweetness of the Geb. It's the sweet stuff pertaining to mystery. Missing it makes us rightly sick. MS could stand for the inheritance of what the brain does when seeing to interdimensionally connected Modern Science. But instead it stands for a sensible multiplex of excessive resistance to change. It is not ALS what you think and it never ever will be. Because Stephen Hawking knows it all to be too well. If you are it thinking that is cruel, you should meet cancer. You are responsible.
We don't want theories
Not even scientists really want theories. We want truth. The general modern consensus is that it is somewhat humble to leave an opening to be disproved in. I will never disprove anything and that is the light within which I illuminate the reality of science as the most arrogant approach to undertake the potentiality of reality within. That is okay, but I will not stand for that you conclude yourself as smart person, when you insist on it not being based on assumption. It is only based on assumption. That is also okay, but unless it also includes the notion that even that which cannot be proven or even seen, must have a place within any real scientific purview; it is not science at all - it is arrogance. Plain pure lucid arrogance. It shines idiot. Do you really want to be a cogwheel of that? I put all the cogs on it, so that you won't have to feel stupid if that is the real case. I know which one is yours. Have fun, love.
Idiot is the dogma of classical science. Modern science has given providence for the mystery, but it will never allow my mystery purview within its context. Modern is the stupidity of the idiocy. It is the idiosyncrasy of notion. Don't use idiosyncrasy, it is idiosyncratic to the fear of being wrong. Fear of being wrong is the modern purview. Not pertaining the mysterious in the purview of being wrong, means that you will be wrong. It is wrong to fear. It puts everyone around us at risk. Since there is no-one around us, I am the one that will suffer. Therefore I make the ones that does into idiots, so that they can be scientifically manipulated. That gives everyone else respite in sacred spaces.
You should love science, but the mystery of it even more. Lest there is nothing about science to love - being right. Science is the idea of being right, therefore it must include the idea of being wrong, unto its foundation. Since the error is avoidable without excluding the unknown while we seek for what it entails, it must involve the scientific notion of an idea that we have not yet concluded. Given we contextually cannot know which one that could be, we must obtain them all impossibly. That does not make it a mystery. It makes it The Mystery. It provides the means to avoid theories and instead, pertain to ideas that marks the turning points in our quest for truth. Faith in yourself.
There is a system to this. It is commonly known as The Scientific Method. You might think that you know what that is and while that may be true. Do you understand how it is? Why it is? Which it is? When? But first and foremost - do you understand who it is? Have you understand the essence of that it is? Don't care? Then you are a modern scientist and will get to know your arrogance in my way. I really do not like that way. But if you really want to be a scientist, then you must be a real scientist. Really means must. Modern means timely, so allow me to introduce you to the real timely sense.
It will be fun. All you have to do to get past the arrogance is to recognize that the light is timeless, that it is in the world because it is the Light of the World. Then conclude the notion of what the light timelessly might have achieved, put it into a single quantum and call all the potentiality of that, the Christ. Then you have made your first and only vital step to become a Real Scientist. Jesus touched that sense in a real timely sense. Therefore He is the Real Timely sense of a Real Timely sense.
What you scientifically perceive as progress is what I call discovering the way. What you find when you bump into the prime notions of The Mystery, pertaining to the way is what I call the truth. Then of course there is your own sense of that, it is what I call it; when the truth coincides with itself, by means of the way in the life. All in all, that is us. If that wasn't enough, then I want to promote the notion of that we are us. Yes Us. That is The Light. If you still want to be a little wrong every time you uncover truth with the fake humility in theorizing it; then I will happily introduce you to walk my path as I did your way, to accommodate your truth, by living my life. Data does not cover the inside of a black hole. Neither will you ever know the inside of them all.
Get real. I beckoned for so long it became my Love beckoning for me. Do you know what I had to do to it to agree to that? Did you know that it was your choice that in your pertained sense of deceitful humility forced it to accept that? Humility is when you accept all truth before knowing what it is. Truth is believing what you might see in that humility. Love is believing that everyone always does that. That, I don't even want to talk about. When you are really a scientist, that is what you'll know. Don't leave it hanging. I am begging. I am not here to serve anymore. I am here to listen to your beckoning onto that loving us. Then accept it. Objective or stupid was always the question in really pertaining to the real answer. My answer is still yes.